Why RWA Tokenization Isn't Mainstream? (Yet)

Why Tokenization Isn't Everywhere Yet

TokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain hasn't failed, but it didn't skyrocket either, yet. The technology's ready. But the law, compliance, and liquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price systems haven't caught up. And yet, in some corners of the world, this shift is already happening, because the need and pain are what drive adoption.

So far, we've shown what RWATangible assets represented on-chain tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain could do. But if it's so good, why hasn't it gone mainstream?

Because right now, it's a half-built house (I'm aware of the word play). Here's what's still missing:

Legal Enforcement

A tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value isn't ownership. Not unless the legal wrapper is iron-clad.

It's the first wall most tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain projects crash into — and pretend they didn't.

A tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value sitting on EthereumA decentralized blockchain platform that enables smart contracts and decentralized applications means nothing to a judge. Courts don't care what your MetaMask walletA tool for storing, sending, and receiving cryptocurrencies says. They care about deeds, filings, and who holds the title in the real world.

No SPV, no trust, no registered entity? You're not holding rights. You're holding exposure. And exposure doesn't survive a court order.

Take a simple case. You buy a tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value that 'represents' a condo in Florida. Sounds impressive. But unless that token is tied, in law, to an LLC that holds the deed, you've bought a promise. And promises don't survive lawsuits. Or foreclosures.

Same story with Ferraris, fine art, carbon credits, rare Bordeaux. No legal spine behind it? You're not investing. You're gambling.

Most so-called "RWATangible assets represented on-chain tokens" are just IOUs in new packaging. They look sharp enough on a dashboard. But they collapse at the first sight of a real claim.

“

"A tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value isn't ownership. Not unless the legal wrapper is iron-clad."

Real enforceability isn't on the blockchainA decentralized, digital ledger of transactions maintained across multiple computers. It's in the dull paperwork: contracts, registrations, trustees, enforcement rights. Smart contractsSelf-executing code on a blockchain that automates transactions automate agreements. Court judgments enforce them.

Regulatory Clarity

Is your tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value a security? A commodity? A digital receipt? A reward point? Depends who you ask, and which side of the ocean you're on.

In the EU, MiCAAn EU regulatory framework standardizing crypto rules for issuers and service providers is a start. It gives stablecoins and some utility tokens a framework, but leaves RWAs floating in limbo, especially when they're tied to off-chainA decentralized, digital ledger of transactions maintained across multiple computers ownership.

MiCAAn EU regulatory framework standardizing crypto rules for issuers and service providers stands for Markets in Crypto-Assets, it's the EU's attempt to regulate the crypto space under one rulebook.

It defines three main types of tokens:

1. Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs) — think stablecoins backed by baskets of currencies or assets (e.g. gold, fiat).
2. E-Money Tokens (EMTs) — stablecoins pegged to a single currency, like a tokenized euro.
3. Other Crypto-Assets — basically everything else, including utility tokens and some NFTs.

It brings in licensing, whitepaperA document outlining the technical details and purpose of a blockchain project rules, reserve requirements for stablecoins, and AML compliance. But it still doesn't clearly cover tokenized real-world assets. If your tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value represents equity in an SPV that holds a building, it might fall under securities law — outside MiCAAn EU regulatory framework standardizing crypto rules for issuers and service providers's scope.

So yes, it helps. But for RWAs? It's not the finish line. You still need local legal wrappers and enforcement structures, or the whole thing is just marketing dressed as innovation.

In the U.S., it's worse. You're stuck in SEC vs. CFTC turf wars. Anything with a yield might be a security. Anything tradeable might be a commodity. Nothing is fully safeBinance emergency fund term now used broadly to claim funds are secure unless it's a stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold — and even those are under fire.

Elsewhere, like the UAE, Singapore, or Switzerland, frameworks are emerging — but they're still fragmented. One country's "utility tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value" is another's "unlicensed offering."

And here's the best part: even if your legal wrapper is perfect (see point 1), if the regulator classifies your tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value as a security and you didn't file the right paperwork — the whole structure collapses.

That's why most tokenized deals today live in the grey: They're structured just safely enough to avoid headlines, but not solid enough to scale. And when you're in the grey, enforcement becomes optional — until someone decides it's not.

Real Custody

Storing a tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value is easy. Storing the underlying asset, that's the real problem.

In the tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain world, it's not enough to mint a digital representation. Someone still has to safeguard the actual thing.

A tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value tied to real estate, fine art, or commodities only works if the asset is held by a trusted, legally accountable custodian. No custody = no credibility.

Let's say a tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value represents a $500,000 case of rare wine. Who's storing it? Under what terms? What if the storage company folds, gets hacked, or the wine spoils?

Real-world custody means physical control, jurisdictional clarity, and a paper trail that holds up in court. Most projects aren't there yet.

Some cut corners — claiming "tokenized gold" but holding it in unregulated vaults, offshore. Others skip custody altogether and just track price exposure.

But here's the truth: If your rights can't be enforced, and the asset can't be retrieved — you're not owning the asset. You're renting belief.

Liquidity Fairy Tales

Everyone selling tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain loves to talk about liquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price. "24/7 trading." "Global access." "Instant settlement." Sounds great — until you actually try to sell the thing.

Most RWATangible assets represented on-chain tokens are in closed gardens. Locked ecosystems. You can buy them, sure. But try to exit — and you'll find there's no real market.

No bid. No price discovery. No secondary volume. Just a slick interface and a withdrawal form that says "pending."

And here's why: LiquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price doesn't appear just because something is on-chainA decentralized, digital ledger of transactions maintained across multiple computers. It needs demand, trusted valuation, market makers, and regulated venues. In other words — the same things that make private equity, bonds, or real estate tradable in the real world.

Without those? You've just digitized illiquidity.

It's not new. It's just shinier.

“

"TokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain doesn't solve illiquidity. It just digitizes it, until the law, the market, and the money agree to play."

That's why the best RWATangible assets represented on-chain platforms today don't promise liquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price up front. They build it gradually, pairing legal enforceability with credible assets, then layering access and resale markets once there's critical mass.

Because if no one's buying, the tokenA digital asset built on an existing blockchain, often representing utility or value doesn't matter.

So What's the Real Bottleneck?

It's two-fold: legal enforceability and true liquidity. Most RWA platforms today are walled gardens — tokens can be issued, but there's nowhere meaningful to trade them. Even when the tech is solid, you're often just digitizing an illiquid asset, not making it liquid. Real estate is already slow to move. Tokenization might streamline a few steps, but the buyer still needs KYC, the asset still needs valuation, and the deal still needs jurisdictional teeth. And without enforceable ownership, you're not selling property — you're selling a placeholder.

You'd think institutions would jump in to fix this. But they haven't. Why? Because liquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price at scale requires legal clarity, regulatory licenses, and standardized assets. That's expensive. It's jurisdiction-specific. And right now, there's no deep secondary demand to justify it. Market makers don't show up for fractional condos in closed apps. There's no spread to play. And ironically, too much liquidity becomes a compliance hazard — platforms risk getting classified as unlicensed exchanges.

The truth is simple: if enforceability were ironclad, institutional greed would take care of the rest. LiquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price isn't a tech feature — it's a byproduct of trust, demand, and legal certainty. Until those align, tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain remains an upgrade in infrastructure — not in outcomes.

But What If Tokenization Could Do This?

Now pause.

Forget finance for a second. Forget treasuries and condos.

Let's talk about you, me, and the weird little moments in life that actually matter.

Imagine a world where…

• You're online dating. You prove you're real, local, and over 18 - without ever uploading a face pic.
• You're job hunting in Web3Next generation internet powered by blockchain enabling user ownership of data and digital assets. You prove you're top 5% on-chainA decentralized, digital ledger of transactions maintained across multiple computers as a Solidity dev - without giving up your LinkedIn.
• You're claiming a crypto airdropFree distribution of cryptocurrency to wallet holders, often as a promotional tactic. You prove you didn't double-dip - without linking your walletA tool for storing, sending, and receiving cryptocurrencies publicly.
• You're trying to get a loan. You prove your income meets the threshold - but the bank never sees your actual salary.
• You're joining a private event or metaverse club. You prove NFTA unique digital asset representing ownership of specific content, like art or music ownership - without revealing which one.
• You're voting in a DAOA group governed by smart contracts and blockchain technology, without centralized leadership. You cast your vote with full weight - but no one can trace your holdings.

This isn't theory. This is selective transparency. This is the real power of ZKP (Zero Knowledge Proof).

Proof without exposure. Trust without full surrender.

And that's when tokenization stops being a financial tool… and becomes a human one, as done by the Buenos Aires municipality with QuarkID.

“

"TokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain isn't about speed. It's about proof. And used right, it's power."

So Who Wins?

Not who you think.

It's not the tech startups. It's the players who control three things at once:

• Legal structures
• Asset sourcing
• Distribution channels (existing investors, not just crypto-native)

Think platforms like:

• Ondo Finance (tokenizing treasuries with real yield + big names like BlackRock)
• Centrifuge (lending real-world collateral)
• JP Morgan's Kinexys (with an average daily transaction volume >$2B)

The winners will be those who own boring infra, not just shiny apps.

Why Emerging Markets Might Leapfrog Everyone?

Countries like Nigeria, Pakistan, and the Philippines are leapfrogging the West because they don't have entrenched financial systems. There's no deep-rooted legacy holding them back. These markets don't need better — they need possible. And they're skipping the middlemen.

Here's why they'll likely move faster:

Less Infrastructure to Disrupt

In places where banking systems are broken or inaccessible, tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain offers a better way to transfer assets and access capital.

Younger, Crypto-Native Populations

People in these regions are more open to decentralized solutions, skipping over traditional systems that were never robust in the first place.

Speed Over Compliance

Western regulators are slow, cautious, and bureaucratic. But in emerging markets, there's a sense of urgency to bypass old systems and embrace the future.

Tokenized land. Tokenized trade finance. Tokenized savings. Coming faster than the West thinks.

For tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain to scale, it needs critical mass. The West might be mired in red tape. But the rest of the world? They're moving, and quickly.

In the U.S. and Europe, tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain feels like an upgrade. But in emerging markets, it's survival.

What Comes Next

The RWATangible assets represented on-chain tokenizationConverting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain market has grown from $85 million in 2020 to $30 billion by mid-2025 — a nearly fivefold increase in three years. Projections vary widely: McKinsey estimates $2-4 trillion by 2030, Boston Consulting Group forecasts $16 trillion by 2030, and Standard Chartered projects $30 trillion by 2034.

But those numbers mean nothing without the foundation: legal enforceability, regulatory clarity, real custody, and genuine liquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price.

The technology is ready. The question is: will the world catch up?

Next Up

Liquidity poolsA pool of locked assets enabling decentralized trading and yield generation promise passive income, but they rarely deliver it without cost. You're not just earning returns, you're absorbing risk you probably weren't aware of. This isn't investing. It's unaware underwriting.